Both SHARK Futures and Tradeify are futures prop firms targeting serious day traders. Both run Rithmic-based execution. Both have funded-trader payout proof. They differ on the things that actually matter once you're funded — payout speed, drawdown structure, pricing curve, and the size of the rulebook. This page lays both side by side without spin.
We don't think there's a "best firm" question with a universal answer. There's a "best firm for the way you trade" question. The conclusion section calls out who each firm is the right fit for.
| Factor | SHARK Futures | Tradeify |
|---|---|---|
| Account sizes | $25K / $50K / $100K / $150K | Multiple tiers including instant-funded and evaluation tracks |
| Evaluation pricing (starting) | From $59 | From comparable starting price (varies by promo) |
| Instant funded pricing (starting) | From $249 | Multiple instant tiers available |
| Profit split | 90/10 | Industry-standard split, tier-dependent |
| Payout time | 6 days | Daily payout cadence on certain plans |
| Minimum days before first payout | 5 trading days | Varies by plan |
| Drawdown type | EOD trailing | Multiple drawdown types depending on plan |
| News trading | Allowed | Generally allowed, plan-dependent |
| Overnight holds | Not allowed | Plan-dependent |
| Platform | Rithmic (Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Quantower) | Rithmic-based |
| Reset on failed evaluation | Yes, discounted | Yes |
| Affiliate program | Up to 17% lifetime | Yes |
Predictable 6-day payouts. SHARK ships a single payout SLA — 6 days from request to bank — across every funded account. There's no plan-tier where the timeline changes. If you want to know exactly when money lands when you click Request, SHARK is the firmer answer.
A short, readable rulebook. Daily loss, EOD trailing drawdown, contract limit, flat by close. That's the rulebook. Traders who've been terminated on a buried clause at another firm usually like that this one fits on a single screen.
90/10 split from day one. No "earn your way to a better split after $X profit" curve. The 90/10 starts on the first payout.
Daily payout cadence on certain plans. Tradeify's instant-funded plans offer a daily payout cycle on qualifying accounts, which is faster than SHARK's 6-day SLA if you only need small frequent withdrawals.
Wider plan menu. Tradeify has shipped more product variants — multiple instant tiers, multiple drawdown structures, and a deeper set of promotional account types. If you want optionality across plan types, that's a structural advantage.
Longer track record on instant-funded products. Tradeify has been shipping instant-funded specifically for longer, and the volume of public payout proof on those plans is larger today.
The drawdown rule is where most traders get tripped up. SHARK runs EOD trailing — the trailing maximum only steps up at the daily close, not on intraday equity highs. That helps traders who size up mid-session and then give some back before close.
Tradeify offers multiple drawdown types depending on the plan. Some are intraday-trailing, which is stricter on midday-drawdown styles. Pick the plan that matches how you actually trade, not the cheapest entry price.
Both run on Rithmic. Both offer Tradovate, NinjaTrader, and Quantower as front-ends. Latency and data quality are functionally identical because the underlying feed is the same. The differentiator is the firm's risk overlay on top of Rithmic, not the platform itself.
SHARK: Discord-first, with email. Most account questions resolved same day during trading hours.
Tradeify: Established support infrastructure with ticket-based and Discord channels. Mature.
Pick SHARK if you:
Pick Tradeify if you:
Both are legitimate firms. The right pick is the one whose rule structure and payout cadence matches how you already trade — not the one with the louder marketing.
If the SHARK side of this comparison fits, start with an evaluation or read the full rules first. If you want to see what funded traders say, read the reviews.